Personal Revenge: Musk’s Extreme Hatred of USAID

Elon Musk’s War on USAID: The Fallout from Starlink’s Ukraine Contracts

In a dramatic escalation of tensions between Elon Musk and the U.S. government, recent reports reveal that USAID—the agency Musk has vowed to dismantle—was investigating Starlink’s controversial contracts in Ukraine. This revelation sheds new light on Musk’s vendetta against USAID, suggesting that his actions may be less about ideological opposition to foreign aid and more about shielding his business interests from scrutiny.

The Backstory: Starlink’s Controversial Role in Ukraine

Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Starlink, a satellite internet service owned by SpaceX, has played a critical role in maintaining communication networks for Ukrainian forces. However, the arrangement has not been without controversy. USAID, which provided funding to subsidize Starlink’s services in Ukraine, began probing allegations of overcharging and mismanagement tied to these contracts .

According to documents obtained by Gizmodo, USAID investigators flagged discrepancies in billing practices, raising concerns that taxpayers may have been overcharged for services rendered during one of the most high-stakes conflicts of our time. Musk, who has publicly feuded with both the U.S. and Ukrainian governments over funding for Starlink, appears to view USAID’s inquiry as an existential threat—not just to his company’s bottom line but also to his reputation as a self-styled “savior” of global crises [[Gizmodo]].

Musk’s Retaliation: Feeding USAID into the Wood Chipper

Fast forward to January 2025, when Musk, now wielding unprecedented power within the Trump administration, declared war on USAID. In a series of late-night tweets, he described the agency as a “radical-left political psy op” and a “criminal organization,” vowing to dismantle it entirely. By Monday morning, USAID’s operations were frozen, its staff placed on administrative leave, and its website scrubbed of years of taxpayer-funded research and data.

Critics argue that Musk’s attack on USAID is not merely ideological posturing but rather a calculated effort to eliminate oversight of his business dealings. As one former federal investigator told Gizmodo, “This isn’t about cutting waste—it’s about silencing anyone who dares question how Elon spends taxpayer money.”

The Broader Implications: A Dangerous Precedent

What makes this situation particularly alarming is the precedent it sets. If private citizens like Musk can use their proximity to power to shut down investigations into their own companies, the implications for accountability are dire. USAID’s probe into Starlink was part of a broader effort to ensure transparency in how American aid dollars are spent abroad—a principle that underpins trust in U.S. foreign policy. Without agencies like USAID to provide checks and balances, there’s little stopping corporate interests from exploiting taxpayer funds for profit.

Moreover, Musk’s actions highlight a growing trend of privatization within the federal government. Under Project 2025, agencies tasked with oversight and regulation are being systematically dismantled or handed over to private entities with vested interests. This shift threatens to erode the very foundations of democratic governance, replacing public accountability with unchecked corporate influence.

Public Reaction and Calls for Accountability

Unsurprisingly, Musk’s crusade against USAID has sparked outrage among lawmakers, watchdog groups, and the general public. Senator Bernie Sanders condemned the move as “a brazen attempt to protect corporate greed at the expense of humanitarian aid,” while House Democrats announced plans to introduce legislation blocking further cuts to USAID. Meanwhile, grassroots organizations have launched campaigns urging Americans to contact their representatives and demand action.

Legal challenges are also underway. Democratic state attorneys general have filed lawsuits seeking injunctions against Musk’s efforts to defund USAID, arguing that such actions violate statutes like the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 [[Gizmodo]]. These legal battles could drag on for months—or even years—but they underscore the importance of defending institutions designed to hold powerful actors accountable.

Conclusion: A Test of Democracy

Elon Musk’s assault on USAID represents more than just another chapter in his ongoing feud with regulators; it’s a test of whether American democracy can withstand the corrosive effects of concentrated wealth and unchecked ambition. At stake is not only the future of foreign aid but also the integrity of systems meant to safeguard the public interest.

As investigations into Starlink’s Ukraine contracts continue—and as courts weigh in on the legality of Musk’s actions—one thing is clear: the fight to preserve accountability and transparency is far from over. For those committed to protecting democratic norms, the message is simple: remain vigilant, speak out, and resist attempts to rewrite the rules in favor of the powerful few.

• Nonprofit BuildLA Initiative Looks to Overcome Status Quo
• How BuildLA Initiative is Forging a Revolutionary Path for Disaster Recovery & Housing Innovation
• How Seven Judges and a Satellite Network Stole America’s Election
• Musk Admission He Would Be in Prison Looms Large
• The Shadow Manifesto: all we Know on the Minnesota Assassin

Read more…

[[Gizmodo]] “Elon Musk’s Enemy USAID Was Investigating Starlink Over Its Contracts in Ukraine”