Rudy Giuliani, the former New York City mayor and personal attorney to Donald Trump, has been found in contempt of court for the second time in a week, marking a dramatic escalation in his legal troubles stemming from his false claims about the 2020 presidential election. The latest ruling, issued by U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell on January 10, 2025, comes just days after another federal judge, Lewis J. Liman, held Giuliani in contempt for failing to comply with court orders related to a $148 million defamation judgment.
The Defamation Case and Its Fallout
Giuliani’s legal woes began in 2021 when Ruby Freeman and her daughter, Wandrea “Shaye” Moss, two Georgia election workers, sued him for defamation. Giuliani had falsely accused them of tampering with ballots during the 2020 election, claiming they were passing USB drives to rig vote-counting machines. In reality, they were sharing a box of mints. These baseless allegations led to a torrent of racist threats and harassment, upending the lives of the two women.
In December 2023, a federal jury awarded Freeman and Moss $148 million in damages—$75 million in punitive damages and $73 million in compensatory damages. The jury found Giuliani liable for defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and civil conspiracy.
First Contempt Citation: Failure to Comply with Asset Turnover
On January 6, 2025, Judge Lewis J. Liman in New York held Giuliani in contempt for failing to provide financial information and assets required to satisfy the defamation judgment. Giuliani had been ordered to turn over documents and valuables, including his Manhattan apartment, a Mercedes-Benz convertible, and a signed Joe DiMaggio jersey. However, he failed to meet the December 20, 2024, deadline, producing only a handful of “cherry-picked” documents and no phone records or emails.
Giuliani claimed he was unable to comply due to the overwhelming demands of multiple legal cases, including criminal charges in Georgia and Arizona related to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. He also blamed his previous attorney for the delays and insisted he was conducting his own investigation into the missing DiMaggio jersey.
Judge Liman dismissed these excuses, stating that Giuliani had “willfully violated a clear and unambiguous order of this court” and engaged in a “shell game” to avoid compliance.
Second Contempt Citation: Continued Defamation
Just days later, on January 10, 2025, Judge Beryl Howell in Washington, D.C., found Giuliani in contempt for continuing to defame Freeman and Moss on his livestream show, “America’s Mayor Live.” Despite a court-ordered agreement in May 2024 to stop spreading lies about the women, Giuliani repeated false claims in November 2024, alleging that ballots were quadruple-counted and that election workers were passing hard drives to rig machines.
Howell criticized Giuliani for portraying himself as a victim and failing to take responsibility for his actions. “It is outrageous and shameful,” she said. “This takes real chutzpah, Mr. Giuliani.” She ordered him to file a sworn declaration within 10 days confirming he had reviewed all trial testimony and depositions, warning that future violations could result in jail time.
Giuliani’s Response and Social Media Outbursts
Giuliani has remained defiant, using social media to attack the judges and the legal process. Before the January 10 hearing, he posted on X (formerly Twitter), calling the proceeding a “hypocritical waste of time” and accusing Judge Howell of being “bloodthirsty” and biased.
His attorney, Eden Quainton, argued that Giuliani’s comments were protected by the First Amendment and that he genuinely believed his claims about election fraud. However, Howell dismissed this defense, stating, “So because he was good for a few months, we ought to excuse any bad behavior after that?”
The Broader Context
Giuliani’s legal troubles are part of a broader reckoning for those who sought to overturn the 2020 election. He faces criminal charges in Georgia and Arizona, and his financial situation has deteriorated significantly. Despite filing for bankruptcy in 2023, his case was dismissed, leaving him exposed to creditors.
Freeman and Moss, meanwhile, continue to grapple with the fallout from Giuliani’s lies. “Money will never solve all my problems,” Freeman said after the verdict. “I can never move back into the house that I call home. I will always have to be careful about where I go and who I choose to share my name with.”
Advertisement
Conclusion
Rudy Giuliani’s repeated contempt citations highlight his refusal to abide by court orders and his ongoing defiance in the face of legal consequences. As his legal battles continue, the case serves as a stark reminder of the real-world harm caused by the spread of false information and the importance of accountability in the justice system.