Tag Archives: chatgpt app

AI, ChatGPT

New Version of ChatGPT is Coming at $20 Monthly

High demand spurs quick transition to paid subscription version

OpenAI, the innovative San Francisco start-up, has made a splash in the tech world with its experimental online chatbot, ChatGPT. This AI-powered language model has garnered widespread interest for its ability to answer questions, write poetry, and engage in conversation on a vast array of topics.

The company has confirmed that it is releasing a commercial version of ChatGPT to be called ChatGPT Plus, which will be available to subscribers for $20 per month. This premium service will offer 24/7 access, quicker response times, and some new features.

This new breed of chatbots is seen as a game-changer in the world of computer software, and is expected to revolutionize internet search engines, virtual assistants, and email programs. ChatGPT has already become a hit with students for writing term papers, and businesses for creating marketing materials. However, the technology also comes with certain limitations, as the chatbots are trained on vast amounts of digital text from the internet, which can sometimes be biased and unreliable. Amid a lot of controversy, some of it possibly initiated by the media, the use and adoption of the service has been lightening fast.

Initially, ChatGPT Plus will only be available to users in the United States, with OpenAI starting a waiting list for the service, which it plans to roll out to other countries soon. Running these chatbots is an expensive affair, with OpenAI spending single-digit cents on each interaction. The new subscription service is aimed at offsetting some of these costs while still offering a free version of the chatbot to users.

As the free service is in jeopardy of becoming congested and perhaps being slower to upgrade, the barrier to other, similar services, such as Jasper AI are coming down and this competition should be good for the emerging technology.

Widespread use already expanding across sectors

The emergence of chatbots like ChatGPT is a testament to over a decade of research and development in the field of computer software. These AI-powered language models have the potential to fundamentally transform a range of online services, including internet search engines (such as Google and Bing), virtual assistants (such as Alexa and Siri), and email platforms (such as Gmail and Outlook).

One of the key advantages of chatbots like ChatGPT is their ability to generate digital text that can be easily adapted for various purposes. Already, students are utilizing the chatbot to write term papers, while companies are using it to craft email messages and other marketing materials. With even news outlets like CNET and Buzzfeed touting plans to publish content with the assistance of CHatGPT, it’s likely to become ubiquitous within months.

Please help keep us publishing the content you love

Lynxotic may receive a small commission based on any purchases made by following links from this page

AI, ChatGPT

ChatGPT vs Jasper AI: An In-Depth Comparison of Language Models

Now that ChatGPT Pro is in the wild a comparison is even more useful…

Though each has unique features and strengths, with the possibility that subscription fees will be required for top performance, choosing what works best for your particular needs becomes more important.

The free version of ChatGPT has been a huge success with more than a million users in the first week of release. Jasper AI is a leader in a similar space but with a focus on business applications.

Here’s how the team at Jasper AI describe it:

“OpenAI is a partner of Jasper’s and GPT 3.5 is one of the language models we use in our platform. Jasper Chat is different than ChatGPT in that it is built for business use cases like marketing, sales and more. But both interfaces offer a way to make AI much more accessible to the audiences they serve.”

The field of artificial intelligence continues to advance, and businesses and individuals alike are becoming more and more reliant on natural language processing (NLP) models. From chatbots to document summarization, these models are being used to automate a wide range of tasks and processes, improving productivity and efficiency.

Screenshot in tweet showing ChatGPT pro pricing

Two of the leading NLP models on the market today are ChatGPT and Jasper AI. Both of these models are built using cutting-edge AI and machine learning techniques, and both are capable of providing highly accurate and sophisticated results. However, there are some important differences between the two models that are worth exploring. In this article, we’ll take a closer look at ChatGPT vs Jasper AI and help you determine which model is the best fit for your needs.

Key Features and Functionality

One of the key differences between ChatGPT and Jasper AI is the range of features and functionality that each model offers. ChatGPT is designed to be a highly versatile model that can be used for a wide range of NLP tasks, including text generation, question answering, sentiment analysis, and more. Jasper AI, on the other hand, is can do many of the same tasks but is specifically designed for use in business related activities like marketing and customer service applications, such as chatbots and virtual assistants.

The uses for both are constantly expanding. According to Krista Doyle, SEO at Jasper, Jasper’s best use-case today is content-forward marketing and sales teams at scaling companies.

In terms of text generation, both models are highly capable. ChatGPT uses a deep neural network to generate text that is both relevant and grammatically correct. Jasper AI uses a similar approach, but with a focus on ensuring that the generated text is customer-friendly and easy to understand.

In case you are wondering how Google is viewing the emerging world of articles and blog posts assisted by AI, here’s what Jasper AI says about it, which has been confirmed in tweets directly from Google:

“Google penalizes low-quality content. And frankly, we agree that it should. This is far more about quality of your writing than about the tools used to create it. If your AI-written content is low quality and doesn’t help readers, it’ll get dinged. If your HUMAN written content is low quality and doesn’t help readers, it’ll get dinged. There’s nothing inherent about the way that AI content is written that leaves a fingerprint, but any reader can suss out shallow writing.”

Krista Doyle, SEO, JASPER AI

Performance and Accuracy

When it comes to performance and accuracy, both ChatGPT and Jasper AI are leaders in their field. ChatGPT is known for its high level of accuracy, even when handling complex and nuanced text. Jasper AI is similarly accurate, but with a focus on delivering results that are both relevant and customer-friendly.

In terms of speed, ChatGPT is known for its fast processing times, even for large and complex text inputs. Jasper AI is similarly fast, but with a focus on delivering results that are both accurate and relevant.

Integration and Customization

Another important consideration when choosing between ChatGPT and Jasper AI is the level of integration and customization that each model offers. ChatGPT provides a highly flexible API that can be easily integrated with a wide range of applications and systems. Jasper AI offers similar levels of integration, but with a focus on ensuring that the model can be easily customized to meet the specific needs of different businesses and organizations.

The Bottom Line

So, which model is the better choice: ChatGPT or Jasper AI? The answer to this question will depend largely on your specific needs and requirements. If you’re looking for a versatile NLP model that can be used for a wide range of tasks and processes, then ChatGPT is the clear choice. However, if you’re looking for a model that is specifically designed for use in business, marketing and customer service applications, then Jasper AI is the way to go.

Clearly, both ChatGPT and Jasper AI are highly capable NLP models that are capable of delivering accurate and sophisticated results. Whether you choose ChatGPT or Jasper AI, particularly is you are choosing between the ChatGPT Pro plan and Jasper AI, you can be confident that you’re making a wise investment in the future of your business.

Please help keep us publishing the content you love

Lynxotic may receive a small commission based on any purchases made by following links from this page

AI, ChatGPT

A New Wave of AI Tools are Arriving on the Heels of ChatGPT Mania

A few are here and jumping out of the gate

The stir created by the release of ChatGPT3 at the end of November in 2022 has been powerful and continues to grow. Articles written about the generative chatbot AI tool (currently with a free, and now also a “pro” version for $42) seem to multiply by the hour. And no one knows how many articles are also getting at least a partial assist from the service.

There are many that are tapping into the OpenAI API for ChatGPT and adding or extending functions and features, such as a brand new SincodeAI which comes out of Sweden and has front end features and an array of “60+ tools” that help users to guide ai in a variety of predetermined use cases, tailored for real world needs.

This kind of layered human guidance engine approach is an emerging category that is just now beginning to become viable as ChatGPT and other AI tools go live and improve.

Recent Lynxotic articles on ChatGPT:

Should Google Block all ChatGPT Generated Content?

Hey ChatGPT, Be my Oracle, my Mirror, my Research Intern (!?)

Everything You’ve Read About ChatGPT is Wrong

Hey, ChatGPT 3: Words are Beautiful, Powerful and Meaningful. Prove it to me by writing examples…

ChatGPT Gave this Response to the Question: What is a Virtual Power Plant

On the horizon, even more ways to interact with AI bots, apps and tools

The embrace of generative AI, particularly for creating text based output from ChatGPT, has been swift. First was the admission by CNET that they had published nearly 100 articles using ChatGPT, and then, on January 26th 2023, Buzzfeed announced that they were in preparation to publish ChatGPT assisted content without apology.

As BuzzFeed co-founder Jonah Peretti wrote in a memo sent to staff members and published on the site:

“In 2023, you’ll see AI inspired content move from an R&D stage to part of our core business enhancing the quiz experience, informing our brainstorming, and personalizing our content for our audience. In tough economic times, we need to fight for every penny of revenue, and try to save every penny of costs”

This is, no doubt, the beginning of an avalanche of AI assisted content about to explode into being. Never mind all the hand wringing and soul searching going on in schools and by authors concerned for their livelihoods, the cat is out of the bag, the cow has left the barn, it’s all out there and there’s no turning back.

Google has already come to terms with an AI assisted world of content

As we noted in a recent post, Google has made it clear that it is not concerned with what tools (AI or otherwise) you may use to create content, but rather what it perceives as the quality of the final product. And, apparently, search result rankings will not be based or influenced by the presence or absence of AI “fingerprints”.

And regarding those sought after search results, there’s a new kid in town, an AI chat style search assistant is live and hitting the bricks with a confident swagger:

“Search is broken because of SEO spam, ads, and surveillance capitalism. Andi cuts through the clutter to get you straight to the knowledge you need. It presents results visually in a way that’s easy to understand with a simple chat interface, and protects you from ad tech and distraction.“

Andisearch.com is a “conversational search engine” that uses the now ever-more-familiar chatbot style interface to “to answer questions simply, find you the best information, and help you stay safe and productive online” according to the sites about us page.

I took a test drive and the result was…. refreshing, new and might just give Google yet another reason to be concerned about the future. Particularly on mobile, for which it appears to be designed, the uncluttered simple yet powerful interface is extremely functional and smooth.

There are a lot of takeaways – but the one that stands out in my mind is that they are living up to the promise of doing away with the “SEO spam, ads, and surveillance capitalism” – I test some urls that are “shadow banned” on Google search, or at least not favored for lack of benefit to Google, and they showed up loud and proud in the first result. That is huge.

If you have spent your life trying to win at rigging a rigged system, or paying to be favored in Google search results, that may not be a soothing thought. But if you want to see the most relevant search result as a user it’s hits like a revelation.

And if you want to see a bunch of results they are “boxed” into neat little packages, with logos letting you know what web site they are connected to, that you can scroll through like you are on TikTok or FlipBoard or any modern UX for browsing mobile results.

Compared to the various Google style “alternative” search engines this comes across as a real breakthrough – the conversational style – where you can ask using a ChatGPT style prompt and get a single descriptive answer – or you can do a more traditional search query and then get a scrollable batch of results that are presorted by relevance – depending on how detailed your query is you control the result, in theory.

The interface is so clean, if available within the results, there’s a separate tab for Images, again a clean single series of identically sized images, that can be downloaded or sent to a separate tab with incredible simplicity, as well as a tab for videos with the exact same UX style.

The “reader” view is not hidden but is the second choice at the bottom of each boxed result preview. The first choice is “visit” which opens a full page browser view of the site you’ve chosen. A third option called “Summarize” appears to be in development as it was not yet live at the time of this writing.

Desktop interface search results are clean, sleek and unbiased by spam or sponsored content

With simplicity comes speed and, perhaps, clarity

The overall result is a completely new, uncluttered experience for searching and discovering content. It is still unclear if the chatbot function, basically the ability to synthesize results based on the content of the target results, will prove powerful enough for this to be a two-for-one dream come true.

But just as a deeper, cleaner, faster and possibly better way to search and discover web content, it’s my choice ahead of Google, or at least side by side.

Lynxotic may receive a small commission based on any purchases made by following links from this page

Please help keep us publishing the content you love

AI, ChatGPT

Should Google Block all ChatGPT Generated Content?

Most agree that it’s possible to identify AI generated content: what about partial and hybrid?

There’s a gold rush of sorts in the peripheral app market with an explosion of tools coming out with various ChatGPT related services. On the one side there are AI detectors, meant to identify “non-human” text, at the other end of the spectrum are rephrasing tools to help “cheaters” in schools, or perhaps just blog writers to disguise AI origins with minimal (human) work.

There is, by many, the assumption that Google is or will block or penalize any AI generated content in search results. At the same time companies like CNET, and recently announced Buzzfeed, plus undoubtedly many others, are already publishing or developing content written wholly or partially by AI.

Of course, many publishers have been using computer generated content for years in areas like the stock market and weather updates, where human text would be too expensive to use when the volume of ever changing data points is so high.

It is also questionable if the various apps even function as advertised. For example if a rephrasing app can fool a public AI detector can it also fool Google’s proprietary software?

The bigger issue is: why?

Derivative content and low quality information has been a staple of the online experience since the first bulletin board chat rooms of yore. Even if possible, is it necessary or clearly desirable to filter out all content that has an AI component from Google search results, for example?

Could this also be seen as an anticompetitive move to try to reduce the value of the software of a competitor? And what percentage of AI “infection” should be considered taboo? 90%? How about 47%? And if those percentages are calculated using tools that themselves have an error rate of 10% or more, what is really happening?

Will humans be rewarded by Google for not using AI to assist, at least not directly in content creation or publishing? If not, then how are those humans laboring at a disadvantage going to be able to compete with those that do take the assistance?

ChatGPT and other AI tools are already in circulation and growing

The output of ChatGPT is usually somewhat bland, and depending on the subject matter, often gleaned from obvious sources – it is designed to avoid misinformation by avoiding unusual “untrusted” sources.

This creates text that reads as “safe”, and while generally highly readable and grammatically accurate, is not particularly creative, at least not by human standards. My human prediction is that, with the horse already out of the barn, so to speak, there is no way for any sensible filter to be used that would eliminate AI generated text or AI influenced content from existing side by side with “pure” human generated content.

As Google was quoted to have indicated in tweets, basically, content is content and if it is well written and helpful for humans to read and use in human life, then it is just as good for consumption, with or without AI assistance. They point out that mainly content that is manufactured specifically to trick search engines is what they absolutely hope to filter, not all AI assisted content, even if that were possible. Simple right?

No chatbots were harmed in the making of this content

All that’s left then is the question of best uses for AI in the writing and content publishing process. Best, not in the sense of having AI “fingerprints” or not, but rather in the quality and usefulness of the final product. Same as it ever was. Right?


Lynxotic may receive a small commission based on any purchases made by following links from this page

Please help keep us publishing the content you love