In yet another jaw-dropping display of hypocrisy and projection, former President Donald Trump took to the stage—and social media—to label Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy as a “dictator.” This accusation came on the very same day that Trump declared himself akin to royalty, proclaiming his own authoritarian tendencies with pride.
The Wannabe King Who Cried Dictator
Let’s unpack this absurdity for a moment. On one hand, we have Volodymyr Zelenskyy—a man who rose to power through free and fair elections, has faced relentless attacks from Russian aggression, and continues to lead his nation with courage and resilience amid an existential war. Zelenskyy’s leadership style is far from dictatorial; he governs under intense public scrutiny, often making decisions that reflect both democratic ideals and the urgent needs of his people [1]. He’s not just a democratically elected leader but also a symbol of resistance against tyranny—a stark contrast to anyone accusing him of dictatorship.
On the other hand, there’s Donald Trump, whose behavior during his presidency frequently drew comparisons to autocrats. From undermining judicial independence to attacking the free press, dismissing inspectors general, and attempting to overturn a legitimate election, Trump’s actions consistently raised red flags about his commitment to democracy [2]. And now, after declaring himself essentially untouchable—“a king,” no less—he has the audacity to call someone else undemocratic? It’s enough to make you wonder if he owns a mirror.
Projection: The Kindergarten Playbook
This latest outburst fits perfectly into what can only be described as Trump’s kindergarten playbook: accuse others of precisely what you’re guilty of doing yourself. It’s a tactic straight out of the schoolyard bully handbook. Didn’t share your toys? Call someone else selfish. Got caught cheating at tag? Accuse them of being dishonest. In Trump’s case, when confronted with evidence of his authoritarian leanings, he deflects by pointing fingers elsewhere—even at those who embody everything he lacks: integrity, humility, and genuine patriotism.
Advertisement
Consider the timing of this bizarre accusation. Just hours before calling Zelenskyy a dictator, Trump reportedly referred to himself as having “king-like powers” while addressing supporters [3]. This self-aggrandizing rhetoric isn’t new—it echoes his infamous declaration in 2018 that Article II of the Constitution gives him “the right to do whatever I want.” While most Americans understand that no such clause exists, Trump seems determined to rewrite reality itself, casting himself as some sort of benevolent monarch rather than a servant of the people.
Zelenskyy vs. Trump: A Tale of Two Leaders
To compare Zelenskyy and Trump is to highlight two vastly different approaches to leadership. Zelenskyy leads from the frontlines, literally risking his life alongside his citizens in defense of their homeland. His speeches resonate globally because they emphasize unity, freedom, and sacrifice—not division, ego, or personal gain. When Zelenskyy addresses world leaders or speaks directly to the Ukrainian people, his words carry weight because they are rooted in shared struggle and hope.
Trump, meanwhile, thrives on chaos and spectacle. His rhetoric divides rather than unites, prioritizing loyalty over competence and spectacle over substance. Where Zelenskyy inspires trust through transparency and action, Trump demands allegiance through fear and falsehoods. Labeling Zelenskyy a dictator doesn’t diminish the latter’s standing—it only exposes Trump’s inability to recognize true leadership when he sees it.
Public Reaction: Disgust and Disbelief
Unsurprisingly, reactions to Trump’s comments ranged from disbelief to outright mockery. Social media erupted with memes juxtaposing images of Zelenskyy visiting troops on the battlefield with photos of Trump lounging in Mar-a-Lago. One viral tweet read, “If Zelenskyy is a dictator, then I guess Superman is secretly Lex Luthor.”
Advertisement
Political analysts were equally scathing. “This is classic Trumpian deflection,” said Dr. Jennifer Mercieca, a professor of rhetoric at Texas A&M University. “By calling Zelenskyy a dictator, Trump hopes to distract from his own anti-democratic impulses. But the more he accuses others, the clearer his own flaws become.”
Even some Republican lawmakers privately expressed discomfort with the remarks, though few dared to speak out publicly. As one GOP strategist told Politico, “It’s hard to defend calling a guy fighting off Putin a dictator. That’s not exactly going to play well overseas—or even here at home.”
A Dangerous Precedent
Beyond the immediate absurdity of Trump’s statement lies a deeper concern: the normalization of authoritarian language in American politics. By repeatedly labeling opponents as tyrants or dictators, Trump chips away at the norms that uphold democracy. Words matter, especially when spoken by influential figures. When a former president casually tosses around terms like “dictator,” he risks eroding public faith in institutions and sowing confusion about what constitutes real leadership.
Moreover, these baseless accusations undermine U.S. credibility on the global stage. Allies like Ukraine rely on America’s support—not just militarily but morally. Attacking Zelenskyy weakens that bond and emboldens adversaries like Russia, who eagerly exploit any sign of discord between Western nations.
Advertisement
Conclusion: Check Yourself Before You Wreck Yourself
Donald Trump’s accusation that Zelenskyy is a dictator is laughable—if it weren’t so dangerous. It’s a textbook example of psychological projection, where the accuser projects their own faults onto others. If Trump truly believes Zelenskyy poses a threat to democracy, perhaps he should take a long, hard look in the mirror. What he’ll see staring back isn’t a king—but a wannabe autocrat desperately clinging to relevance.
As the saying goes, “People in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.” Or, in this case, people aspiring to wear crowns shouldn’t call others dictators. Because when it comes to defending democracy, the real kings are the ones willing to stand up for freedom—not tear it down.